Radicals on the Outside, Reformers in the Inside

I read an article by Howard Zinn in the Progressive Magazine last year. He was glad that Obama got elected, but Zinn felt that Progressives should not be expecting Obama to be going too far in a Progressive direction unless he is pressured by Progressive grassroots agitation. I think Zinn is right. I'm actually not that surprised at Obama's more centrist direction. Most of what Obama is doing now is what was stated in his campaign website when he was running for President.
I think that any liberal or moderate Democrat who becomes President is going to run into a fierce opposition to even moderate reforms from conservative Republican groups, corporate interests, conservative Christian activists, and entrenched lobbyists. Politicians only go as far as the public will let them, and if the tea party is making all the noise right now, Obama is going to go in a more centrist direction. In a book I read Paul Wellstone wrote that the only way to overcome the corporate sway in politics is a sustained and loud Progressive grassroots effort.
I personally think the Left needs radical agitation from outside the system and reformers working for change within the system. Radicals may not believe in the system, but I think their involvement in protests is important, because their agitation brings light to important issues, and they provide the ideas for change. Radicals often get frustrated at reformers inside the system because they see reformers making only incremental change, but I think reformers are needed to make radical ideas palatable to the vast majority of Americans who are in the middle of the road. Radicals and liberals are necessary for progressive change. Radicals and reformers often do not agree with each other, but it's important to have both radicals and reformers working in conjunction for any sort of change to take place. The more the radical activists work to educate people and create a mass movement and change attitudes, the more progressive will be the changes that reformers can make within the system.
William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass and the radical abolitionists constantly provided the pressure to force Abraham Lincoln to take stronger positions against slavery, and Lincoln's Presidency was the better for it. Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and the women's suffragists were constantly agitating for the right of women to vote, until the nation finally passed the Nineteenth Amendment and the nation was the better for it. Emma Goldman, Mother Jones, and the Wobblies constanty led protests for worker's rights, which pressured the government to pass the 8 hour work week, child labor laws, the right of workers to organize, and the country was the better for it. The Freedom Riders and Civil Rights activists of the early 1960s pressured Presidents Kennedy and Johnson to pass Civil Rights legislation and their Presidencies were the better for it.
Recently I heard that President Obama was heckled by gay rights protesters who want Obama to repeal "Don't Ask Don't Tell". Though I realize the difficulty that Obama will have in repealing that policy, especially after witnessing the fight over health care reform, I think the protesters are doing the right thing in keeping the pressure on the President so that Obama doesn't back off due to the political difficulties.
I like Obama, and hope he succeeds. I'm going to vote for him in 2012. Though I like Obama, I don't think liberals and progressives should just be his cheerleaders. Like the abolitionists, women's suffragist and civil rights workers, in previous eras, progressives should constantly press Obama into taking stronger progressive stances. I generally like the direction that Obama is trying to take the country, but I think progressives should constantly agitate and make their voices heard. The Democratic Party benefits when the progressives and centrists in the party engage in a lively debate and progressive voices have as much influence as the centrists. As the issues of climate control, immigration, Don't Ask Don't Tell, and financial reform come before the Congress, a strong Progressive voice will benefit both Obama's presidency and the nation as a whole.
- Angelo Lopez's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Comments
Thanks for the memories...
Angelo, the YouTube videos you found on the Freedom Riders are great, and overwhelm me with memories.
Of course I am WAY TOO YOUNG (snort) to have gotten to ride with them... maybe not WAY TOO, but still too young for me to have gone without a parent. And I didn't have a parent willing or able to take off and ride with me. I wanted to be there and followed the coverage daily that summer. Sweet summer, summer of my first serious (well not THAT serious) boyfriend, first summer I can remember being in serious disagreement with my parents.
My mama felt the Freedom Riders weren't polite enough, polite people would leave if they found themselves unwanted. My mama's never been a protest marcher. And these comments I remember were also addressed to the etiquette education of her oldest girlchild. Politically I don't know, although she put in her hours with the League of Women Voters, and stood up in solidarity with that group during some of the group's more unpopular (and progressive) positions. Nonetheless, she was always teacher-mama first.
My father, on the other hand, stood firmly with what passed for law and order in Alabama and Mississippi. He'd try to explain patiently to me why I shouldn't be riding on the Freedom bus. "The governor has said straight out that he couldn't guarantee their safety, that means either don't go or prepare to be attacked." When they were attacked, he'd say they asked for it. I'd ask if it wasn't so that every person was an equal citizen of the US, or should be equal. He'd say that wasn't the issue, the issue was moving on into danger on purpose. Ah we used to go round and round. Uhh, we still do, but not on these issues. It took a while, but my father was able to say every citizen should have the same rights. I think he always believed it, but put pragmatic things above theoretical ones.
Thanks for another stumble down memory lane for me. I do so love watching the historic videos you find.
Thanks Janet
Thanks Janet for the response. I would've loved to have been a Freedom Rider, but I have a feeling my parents would've reacted the same way your parents did. I just discovered recently how many historical videos are in youtube. It's neat to see historical figures talking and moving. And there are some great documentaries there.
I just wrote a blog on the Freedom Riders. I'll post it here soon.
Angelo
Drag queens
It was the Drag Queens marching down 2nd Avenue to Houston Street that made "ordinary" gays respectable (not that Drag Queens don't deserve respect too). Immigration reform is the same. Some of us must argue for hospitality, not just a path to citizenship. Peace requires us to call for jurgas with the militants where talk can replace bullets. Economic reform requires more than removing the barriers to individual enterprise but making the capital and infrastructure available.
If we are going to talk, we may as well say something useful.
Thanks Jim for Reply
That's a good point about immigration. Politicians can make laws, but it's the people in the streets who change the attitudes. I didn't realize that Drag Queens marching had an importance on "ordinary" gays being respectable, but I see how that would be so. Your point about hospitality is a strong point. Even if strong immigration reform laws are passed, immigrants will still face strong discrimination and harassment unless people work to create a more hospitable atmosphere where they are not demonized.
Your comment about peace is good too. I recently watched a youtube video where Howard Zinn notes that apartheid fell without the U.S. having to intervene militarily in that country. Mandela and his party were committed to a long term strategy that led to negotiations to end apartheid.
Angelo