What MLK might say regarding the 61st Anniversaries of Israel and Nakba

In his regards to Israel on it 61st year of existence, President Obama reiterated, "The United States was the first country to recognize Israel in 1948, minutes after its declaration of independence [and] looks forward to working with Israel to advance our common interests, including the realization of a comprehensive peace in the Middle East."
The 1948 Declaration of the Establishment of Israel affirms that, "The State of Israel will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel: it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion it will guarantee freedom of religion [and] conscience and will be faithful to the Charter of the United Nations."
"Words must mean something. Human destiny will be what we make of it."-President Obama, April 5, 2009.
On April 26, 2009, the Israeli police raided the homes of several New Profile activists in different parts of Israel and confiscated their computers. Five were hauled in for interrogation then released on bail under the undemocratic condition to not contact other members of the nonviolent movement for thirty days.
New Profile is an Israeli feminist organization that has been working to demilitarize the society and state for over a decade by creating safe spaces for Israeli youth with conscience to explore their feelings regarding military service and providing them information regarding their legal rights as candidates for mandatory conscription and their right to a conscience that refuses to enable the 41 years of military occupation of the indigenous people of the so called holy land.
What the world needs are more of such voices and others to be heard regarding the 61 years of the ongoing Nakba [Read more: http://www.wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=... ] and the draconian restrictions against Mordechai Vanunu, that continue to forbid him the right to speak to non-Israelis ever since his release from 18 years in Israeli jail [on April 21, 2004] for telling the world that Israel had manufactured upwards of 200 nuclear warheads by 1985. [Read more: http://www.wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=... ]
I wonder about many things and because last weekend I was on a spiritual retreat focused on nonviolent activists for justice such as Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. I was inspired to read "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" a scalding critique of American Christianity that King addressed to his "Dear Fellow Clergymen".
I have taken a few liberties with King's masterpiece by adding a few words in bold [VIEW @ http://www.arabisto.com/article.cfm?articleID=35632 ]
and I address everyone in the world and in particular my sisters and brothers in Christ.
I am on the internet because injustice can be expressed here. I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in comfort and not be concerned about what happens in Israel Palestine.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives in the world can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds.
In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; examining one's motives and acting on conscience with direct action.
Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored I am not afraid of the word "tension." I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth.
Too long has The Peace Process been bogged down in a tragic effort to live in monologue rather than dialogue.
Lamentably, it is an historical fact that privileged groups seldom give up their privileges voluntarily. We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. We must come to see that "justice too long delayed is justice denied."
There are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all."
A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.
Segregation [Translates to Apartheid in Afrikaner] distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. Segregation, to use the terminology of the Jewish philosopher Martin Buber, substitutes an "I it" relationship for an "I thou" relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things.
Hence segregation; apartheid, conscription and military occupation is not only politically, economically and sociologically unsound; it is morally wrong and sinful. Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation. Is not segregation an existential expression of man's tragic separation, his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness?
An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal. By the same token, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that it is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal.
One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.
Everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "legal" and it was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany.
Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever and if repressed emotions are not released in nonviolent ways, they will seek expression through violence; this is not a threat but a fact of history. [End of Letter from Birmingham Jail]
Our times call for extreme expressions of creative NONVIOLENCE and thus, on June 1, 2009 another courageous act of solidarity with the Palestinians of Gaza sets sail once more to break another crack into Israel’s blockade of the 1.5 million civilians; 80% unemployed and 60% under the age of 16 years old.
In August 2008, the FREE GAZA Movement docked their first –and the very first boat in the Gaza port in 41 years. The persistence of internationals, Israelis and Palestinians has launched a humble flotilla of wooden boats and small yachts that sail in international waters into Gaza loaded with humanitarian aid, building supplies, generators, electronic equipment for hospitals and most of all people of hope that prove the world will never forget or remain silent to the misery and distress in Gaza.
Many call the volunteers extremists, and rightly so, for all have risked their lives and some even twice, such as Cynthia McKinney, former Georgia Congresswoman who was on the Free Gaza boat the Dignity when it was rammed three times by the Israeli navy on December 30, 2008 and is returning for more.
In his Letter from Birmingham Jail, King reminded his fellow clergymen that Jesus was an extremist for love who taught his follower's to "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you."
King recalled to his fellow clerics that the Hebrew prophet Amos was an extremist for justice: "Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream."
King behooves us all to recall the extreme vision of Thomas Jefferson and Tom Paine:
"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal"
"Soon after I had published the pamphlet "Common Sense" [on Feb. 14, 1776] in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion... The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine
The world is pulled to change by extremism and our only dilemma is what will we be extremists for? Hate or love? God or State? The preservation of injustice or the extension of justice; equal human rights?
The clinging to the status quo is a form of extremism when all around are the deep groans that rise up from the oppressed, as King addressed from his jail cell:
Few members of the oppressor race can understand the deep groans and passionate yearnings of the oppressed race, and still fewer have the vision to see that injustice must be rooted out by strong, persistent and determined action. Too many others have been more cautious than courageous and have remained silent behind the anesthetizing security of stained glass windows.
There was a time when the church was very powerful--in the time when the early Christians rejoiced at being deemed worthy to suffer for what they believed. In those days the church was not merely a thermometer that recorded the ideas and principles of popular opinion; it was a thermostat that transformed the mores of society. Whenever the early Christians entered a town, the people in power became disturbed and immediately sought to convict the Christians for being "disturbers of the peace" and "outside agitators."'
Small in number, they were big in commitment and by their effort and example they brought an end to such ancient evils as infanticide and gladiatorial contests. Things are different now. So often the contemporary church is a weak, ineffectual voice with an uncertain sound. So often it is an arch defender of the status quo. Far from being disturbed by the presence of the church, the power structure of the average community is consoled by the church's silent--and often even vocal--sanction of things as they are.
If today's church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twenty-first century.
King wondered if organized religion was too inextricably bound to the status quo to save our nation and the world. He knew that "Any nation that year after year continues to raise the Defense budget while cutting social programs to the neediest is a nation approaching spiritual death."
We who claim to be Christian are called to love our enemies and that the daughters and sons of God are the peacemakers. The last words Jesus spoke to his follower's before his martyrdom was to "put down the sword" and his first words after his resurrection [Read more: http://www.wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=... ] was "peace be with you."
During one of my six trips to occupied Palestine since 2005, Mohammad Alatar, film producer of “The Ironwall” addressed my group on an Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions tour through Jerusalem and to the village of Anata and the Shufat refugee camp, in the very area where the prophet Jeremiah in the 6th century B.C. critiqued the violent conflicts in the Mid East, which were already old news: “I hear violence and destruction in the city, sickness and wounds are all I see.” [Jeremiah 6:7]
After we broke bread and ate a typical Palestinian feast prepared by the Arabiya family in the Arabyia Peace Center, Mohammad Alatar said, “I am a Muslim Palestinian American and when my son asked me who my hero was I took three days to think about it. I told him my hero is Jesus, because he took a stand and he died for it. What really needs to be done is for the churches to be like Jesus; to challenge the Israeli occupation and address the apartheid practices as moral issues. Even if every church divested and boycotted Israel it would not harm Israel. After the USA and Russia, Israel is the third largest arms exporter in the world. It is a moral issue that the churches must address.”
While he lived the FBI placed wiretaps on Reverend King's home and office phones and bugged his hotel rooms throughout the country. By 1967, King had become the country's most prominent opponent of the Vietnam War, and a staunch critic of U.S. foreign policy which he deemed militaristic. In his "Beyond Vietnam" speech delivered at New York's Riverside Church on April 4, 1967 [a year to the day before he was murdered] King called the United States "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today."
In 1986 the federal government 'honored' King with a national holiday.
Eileen Fleming, is the Founder of http://wearewideawake.org/ Author "Keep Hope Alive" and "Memoirs of a Nice Irish American 'Girl's' Life in Occupied Territory"
She produced "30 Minutes With Vanunu" and "13 Minutes with Vanunu" because corporate media has been MIA all during a Freedom of Speech Trial in Israel.
- www.wearewideawake.org's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Comments
Comparing Israel to Nazis? Give Me A Break Eileen.
Eileen you are coming awfully close to a line that should not be crossed. You never distinguish between the various factions in Israel while never criticizing the Arab side of the Palestinian equation. More and more you are confirming my suspicion that you harbor anti-Semitic beliefs.
Dearest Angelo and X
You are the most careful and thoughtful reader I have ever encountered.
You are correct that I have been influenced by X -as well as MLK- and it is "the fierce urgency of NOW" that compels me to persist as St. Paul understood: "Do not judge the nonbeliever, but provoke your sisters and brothers onto good works."
In the '60's two black men in America; one a Christian and one a Muslim shared a similar dream with different philosophies and means to achieve them.
Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. had "a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed... that all men are created equal."
Malcolm X's radical creed was, "Anything you can think of that you want to change right now, the only way you can do it is with a ballot or a bullet. And if you're not ready to get involved with either one of those, you are satisfied with the status quo. That means we'll have to change you."
Both men dreamed of a world freed from the bondage of prejudice and racism, a world in which their children would not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.
While King consistently advocated for a brotherhood of all peoples and persisted in only nonviolent actions to achieve it; NOT until after a pilgrimage to Mecca, did X evolve in his spirituality and thus reject his separatist beliefs and begin to advocate for unity and a world wide brotherhood.
Both can be said to have fully understood that there are "truths that are self-evident: That all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights;…[and] that, to secure [those] rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; and, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it."- The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776,
Both men engaged in the struggle to wake up good people whose ears were not ready to hear, whose eyes were not ready to see and whose hearts were not yet pierced to bleed for the least and oppressed of humanity. Both men were shot dead before either could see any of their dreams realized.
A few weeks before Rev. King bled to death on a patch of pavement in Memphis, he said: "Peace for Israel means security, and we stand with all our might to protect its right to exist…I see Israel as one of the greatest outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy."
King died ten months after the ongoing 41 years of Israel's Military occupation of Palestine began.
On May 14, 1948, The Declaration of the establishment of Israel proclaimed: "On the day of the termination of the British mandate and on the strength of the United Nations General Assembly declare The State of Israel will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel: it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion it will guarantee freedom of religion [and] conscience and will be faithful to the Charter of the United Nations."
The Hebrew prophet Amos prayed:
"Let JUSTICE roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream."
I contend that if King and X had lived, they would have followed the call of Amos and stood up for Palestine.
I believe this because it has been said that the Palestinians have become the 'N's' of the world, while in the '70's it was women:
"We insult her every day on TV, and wonder why she has no guts or confidence. When she's young we kill her will to be free; while telling her not to be so smart we put her down for being so dumb."-John Lennon, "Woman is the "N" of the World"
In the 1980s or '90s a PBS drama on Malcolm and Martin
In the 1980s or early 1990s, I saw on PBS a show on a fictional meeting between Malcolm x and Martin Luther King Jr. In the drama, they secretly meet in an apartment and argue out their respective philosophies on how to best better the conditions of the African American community. I haven't seen it since the one time I saw it many years ago, but it was a good drama that highlighted the different approaches of the two men towards agitating for change. It also is a good example of a particular interest of mine: the ongoing clash and influence between radical and liberal thought.
I agree with a comment that Gary wrote (http://www.crossleft.org/node/6878#comment-55230) that Eileen is writing a minority voice on the Palestinian point of view of things. Though I don't always agree with that point of view, I think it's important that it gets heard. From reading and watching some documentaries over the past year, it seems like one of the frustrations of the Palestinians is that they feel their voices are not heard. For me at least, I would like to hear more about the moderate Palestinians, the nonviolent Palestinians, the alternate voices to the damaging rhetoric of Hamas.
I agree with Frank when he wrote (http://www.crossleft.org/node/6878#comment-55228), "The Jews were more than willing to accept the original UN partition; the Arabs were not. Instead of accepting the original two-state solution, the Arabs -- including Christians -- tried to drive the Jews into the sea."
I think the differences we see here are the differences between radical and liberal thought in regards to the Palestinian/Israeli issue. Both want a solution to the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians, but the radicals seem, to me, to be more willing to focus on the plight of the Palestinians and the unequal balance of power that heavily favors Israel. Liberals acknowledge the legitimacy of many Palestinians grievances, but also see that Arabs are just as responsible for this conflict for failing to acknowledge Israel's right to exist and for tolerating rhetoric of the destruction of Israel. This only fuels Israeli insecurities and the Israeli right wing.
In this post, Eileen mentioned New Profile, an Israeli feminist organization. I might be wrong, but I think Eileen is implying in this post and in past posts that without an effective Israeli Left to counter the Right, it's much more difficult to have a resolution in the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians.
Angelo
MLK and Gaza
Why is Isreal and the Jewish people responsible for the Palistians in Gaza? Dosen't Gaza have a border with Eygpt? Are not both Gaza and Eygptians Arabs of the Muslum faith and didn't Eygpt once rule Gaza?
What about the bombing and killing of Christians in Gaza and the virtual destruction of the Christian Community in Bethleham since the Muslums took over. What about the desicration of the Church several years ago in Bethleham or the shooting murder of the baby Jewish girl in Hebron?
Why does the Muslums in both the Gaza strip and West Bank demand that these areas be free of Jews. Is it because all Jews would eventially want to become part of Isreal or that all Jews are agressors and would not live in peace with their Muslum neighbors? Why is it ok and excessusable to attack a 12 year old with an axe as was recently done and then not condemned by the governments in Gaza or the West Bank. How about the lack of Jews and Christians, or churches and synogoges in Saudia Arabia?
Why when given the choice, most Arabs want Isreali citizenship instead of PA or Gaza citizenship, or for that matter any other Arab state?
Why is it that in Lebennon, Palistinians cannot become citizens, cannot vote in Lebennon elections cannot hold jobs and cannot own property? Why is it the death penalty for Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza to sell land to Jews? Yet in East Jerusalum and the West Bank there are numerous cases of Arabs building homes on land the was purchased for Jewish homes?
What kind of backwards logic allows the Arabs to discriminate against and even kill the most innocent Jewish person, yet criticizes the Jewish people for trying to defend their families?
Why do Muslums kill their wifes and daughters for shaming their families?
The Jesus I read about in all the Bibles I have ever read, never supported the killing of Christians and Jews, just because they were Christians and Jews. In fact all my Bibles tell me that Jesus loved the Jewish people so much that he was born Jewish and grew up to be a Jewish Rabbi. While Jesus and the Bible preaches we are to peaceful to our fellow man, the Bible in no way teaches that all beliefs are the same or even valid.
Your article seems to almost worship all that Dr. King said and did in his life. Dr. King was agreat man, but he was a man with all his good points and his bad points whatever they were. Every human who has lived on this earth has done things they regret or that they don't want to be made public. If you think Dr. King was perfect, just talk to p[eople who knew him intemitly, like his wife, I am sure she would have straighten you out on the he was perfect notion. Granted a lot that has come out about Dr. King has been negative and was released for the sole purpose to discredit him, but that being wrong does not mean that everything Dr. King said or did was coreect or even noteworth. For example, Dr. Schokly?? (Sorry I cannot spell.) who invented the transistor was smart, maybe even a genius, at what he did and was educated in, which was Physics. Yet you see these supremist groups use his words to sprout their racist ways-teaching that certain racial groups are inferior because of their genetics. Yet, the Dr. knows as much about biology as the man off the street as he was not educated, nor worked as a biologist.
Yes, the Isreal democracy is not perfect, but in Isreal Arabs are citizens, serve in their military, own property, are allowed to get an education, and health care, and hold high political offices.
In the West Bank and Gaza Jews are not allowed to even live where the PA or Hamas controls, and any Arab who would sell a Jewish person land is given the death penalty. And even if the government would allow them to live, then they would be exactly like the Christians who have to conduct their lives in fear that worshipping G-d in their way could lead to murder death, or mistreatment, or that their children, especially their daughters will be forcibaly converted to be Muslims.
When I start hearing about Muslum countries where Christians and Jews are free to live their lives as their conscience and religion dictate without being persecuted, or where women, homosexuals and other people are free to live and not killed as part of government policy for their normal behavior then I might see your point, but I see none of this. Wasn't a woman just sentenced to whipping in Saudi Arabia after being raped by four men? Isn't it a death sentence in Afghanistan for a Muslum to convert to Christianity? Why are not these injustices pointed out and protested against? Why is it everything the Jewish people do that is criminal or injust, but everything the Arabs or Muslums do justiified because of what the Isrealis supposedly did to them?
Dear Kurt
WHY is it that USA Christians do not want to see or hear their sisters and brothers in Christ suffering in the Holy Land?
The Palestinian Christians where NOT evangelized! They are the indigenous people of the land and direct descendants of first century Christians who do NOT comprehend Western Christians who support the illegal settlers who steal their land and are deaf to their cries for JUSTICE: and end to the 41 years of Military Occupation and equal human rights for all!
WHY is it that when ever anyone speaks up about the INJUSTICES Israel commits against the indigenous peoples of the Holy Land, good people do NOT want to see or hear or understand that speaking up about INJUSTICE done unto the least among us; is an act of LOVE and true friendship!
"Always be ready to speak your mind and a base man will avoid you. Opposition is True Friendship."-William Blake, "Marriage of Heaven and Hell" 1796
In Defense of Eileen
In reading this comment and the recent comment of Frank's, I can understand why both of you may be put off by Eileen's strident style of writing. She can be pretty hard on Israel, and Frank is right when he wrote in a previous post that the Arabs share a lot of the blame for the Palestinian situation for not accepting a two state solution in the 1940s when the U.N. originally set forth that mandate.
I don't always agree with Eileen's posts, and I think the length of her past posts have been sometimes confusing. But I also learned a lot from Eileen's post once one takes the time to carefully read them. Eileen's passion seems to be the group of Palestinian Christians represented by the organization SABEEL and the congregations of Rev. Canon Naim Ateek and Abuna Elias Chacur. If you read her posts during last year, she continually refers to these groups. Here are two quotes from them that I found in past Fleming posts.
"The Palestinians need to become really conscious of and sensitive to the horror of the Holocaust. ...We must understand the importance and significance of the Holocaust to the Jews, while insisting that the Jews understand the tragedy of Palestine for the Palestinians." Rev. Canon Naim Ateek, founder of the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center in Jerusalem.
"I am a Palestinian Israeli who lives for peace and reconciliation. The problem here is not about the land. There is a blockage between Arabs and Jews. It must end. We need to explore a third way to rise above the conflict. There are three million Palestinians living in refugee camps! This injustice must come to an end. Once, we Jews and Arabs were partners and friends. The only way out of this conflict is to rise above it." Abuna Elias Chacur, the Melkite priest and 3 time Nobel Peace Prize nominee
Though she is harsh on Israel, I think it's in context to the suffering that she witnesses to these Palestinian Christians. In other posts, she has explored the one state and two state solutions offered to try to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (http://www.crossleft.org/node/5306 and http://www.crossleft.org/node/5632) . In another post, she explored Jimmy Carter's peace plan(http://www.crossleft.org/node/6785). She did a post on the Israeli Left and its relatively small numbers in comparison to the Israeli Right (http://www.crossleft.org/node/6783).
One of the things that I see is that the titles of her posts and the stridency of her style may make it seem that she is anti-Israel. I may be wrong, but I don't think she is. I just think she sees the desperation of the Palestinians in the refugee camps and the overcrowded cities and is trying to find anyway of drawing attention to it. I think it sometimes backfires on her, but if you read some of her posts closely, there is some good stuff to learn.
When I read her posts, it sort of reminds me of the militant Black rhetoric of H. Rapp Brown, Stokely Carmichael, Malcolm X and the Black Panthers, and their attempts to draw attention to the plight of the 1960s inner city ghettoes. I personally do not like the stridency of the rhetoric, but it may be a sign of the desperation of trying to be heard.
Angelo