Images and Memories, Nightmares and Dreams

www.wearewideawake.org's picture

"In a nutshell, there is a deep schizophrenia in the Holy Land; what we see, hear and talk. Zionism is the original sin; Zionism is an untouchable icon. You can curse Mohammad, you can curse Mary, but not Zionism."

Press Release From:

"Assembly of the Catholic Bishops in the Holy Land"

We, the members of the "Assembly of the Catholic Bishops in the Holy Land" deplore and condemn with utter dismay the repulsive attacks on our Lord Jesus Christ and on His Mother, the Blessed Virgin Mary, carried out on Channel 10 of the Israeli television.

In these days, during a night show on Channel 10, a series of horrible offenses were launched against our faith and consequently against us, Christians. The show directed its attacks to the holiest figures of our Christian belief in an attempt, as the director of the show himself specifically declared, to destroy Christianism. In so doing, Channel 10 was used to desecrate the holiest figures of Christianism offending hundreds of thousands of Christian Israeli citizens and of many millions of Christians all over the world as well.

The Catholic Bishops in the Holy Land consider such program a symptom of greater problems disturbing the society, such as intolerance, refusal to accept and respect the other and inherent hatred. More important, the Heads of Churches view this recent incident in the larger context of continuous attacks against Christians throughout Israel over the years. Only a few months ago, copies of the New Testament were publicly burnt in the yard of a synagogue in Or Yehuda. Since years, Christianity has been doing a lot to stop some manifestations of anti-semitism, and now Christians in Israel have to find themselves victimised by a low profile manifestation of anti-Christianism?

While condemning this and all other intolerant acts, we call on all concerned parties to investigate the matter and to take the necessary actions in order to put an end to such horrible desecration of our faith. It is unconceivable that such incidents have to occur in Israel which hosts some of the holiest shrines of Christianity and which rely to a great extent on pilgrimage from Christian Countries.

Therefore, we ask the Israeli people and its Authorities to take the appropriate measures against such unacceptable offense and its perpetrators. At the same time, we urge Channel 10 to acknowledge its responsibility and to officially and publicly apologise for this incident and never to allow its repetition.

We want also to express our understanding and appreciation to the deep reaction of our Christian Communities and Institutions as well as to the many reasonable representatives of Moslems and Jews who were themselves shocked and appalled and expressed their dismay and protest at this fact. Actually such programs have nothing to do with freedom of expression, art and entertainment. They can only work against national integration and harmony in our society.

We call on them all to exercise the utmost seriousness and restraint and to follow their Ecclesial Authorities in dealing with this very important and delicate matter.

Jerusalem, February 18, 2009.

His Beatitude Fouad Twal, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem
His Beatitude Michel Sabbah, Emeritus Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem
His Excellency Elias Chacour, Greek Melkite Archbishop of Akka
His Excellency Paul Sayya, Maronite Archbishop of Haifa
His Excellency Giacinto-Boulos Marcuzzo, Latin Patriarchal Vicar / Israel
His Excellency Pierre Melki, Syrian Catholic Patriarchal Exarch
His Excellency Yousef Jules Zerey, Greek Melkite Patriarchal Exarch
His Excellency Butros Mouallem, Emeritus Greek Melkite Archbishop of Akka
His Excellency Kamal Bathish, Emeritus Auxiliary Bishop of Latin Patriarch
Fr. Pier Battista Pizzaballa, ofm, Custos of the Holy Land
Msgr. Rafael Minassian, Armenian Catholic Patriarchal Exarch
Fr. Paul Colin, Chaldean Catholic Patriarchal Exarch
Fr. Pietro Felet scj, Secretary General

The offending You Tube is in Hebrew, with Arabic sub-titles, but the images speak for themselves.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_lH_aXl7GU

The above caused me to recall what I wrote on July 22, 2007 and October 18, 2007:

“In a nutshell, there is a deep schizophrenia in the Holy Land; what we see, hear and talk. Zionism is the original sin; Zionism is an untouchable icon. You can curse Mohammad, you can curse Mary, but not Zionism.”- Professor Albert Aghazarian, July 19, 2007 during Sabeel’s 2nd International young Adult Conference in Jerusalem:

40 Years in the Wilderness: 40 Years of Occupation

On page A3 of the July 20, 2007 edition of Haaretz that deep schizophrenia was printed in black on newsprint. The page was filled with looking back two years ago at the ‘disengagement’ from the Gaza Strip, which in reality was a redeployment for Israel continued to maintain full control of air, water and sea borders.

The Gush Katif evacuees from the Gaza Strip-who settled there illegally under international law have documented and commemorate what the state destroyed; and under international law, should never have built.

Soldiers in the Kissufim area say some evacuees come back to the roadblock, stand silently at what once was the entrance to the Gush Katif settlement and stare into the distance, with tears in their eyes.

The evacuees are also:

“Planting the desire to return. Rabbi Kobi Bornstein, a former resident of Neveh Dekalim and leader of the anti-disengagement struggle, says, "we are not talking about breaking through fences, but about planting the desire in the people of Israel to return there." Bornstein is sure the Jews will return.

“The willingness to return if possible comes to the fore in the video interview project that Mordi Kirshner is doing for the Settlers' Committee (the umbrella organization of the evacuees). He has filmed 160 out of 300 planned interviews. "We give the person a chance to tell his (or her) story," he says. Kirshner copied the framework from the taping of survivors' testimonies for the Steven Spielberg Holocaust Videotape Archive. He says he treats the interview as testimony.
“The interviews reveal a sense of betrayal felt toward the man seen as the patron of Gush Katif (Ariel Sharon) and disappointment with Israeli society after the disengagement. Many interviewees reported dreams of seeing their former homes and waking up in the morning with a sense of happiness. “

So, I wonder do the settlers even have a clue about the truth and the near 60 years of pain of those who were forced to flee in 1948?

Palestinians left in droves for fear of death by the hands of the Zionists who came to claim their homes and property, and which resulted in creating 750,000 refugees who have now multiplied into the millions; and all have been denied the inalienable right to return to their legally owned property.

On October 18, 2007, I wrote a dream: Wake Up Time from the Holocaust Hangover

"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they attack you; and that's when you win."-Gandhi

[Jerusalem, July 22, 2007] I had no clue when I gave 'birth' to my website, exactly two years ago to this day, what I was really doing, but, after my first of five journeys to Israel Palestine and listening to many of the people who live here and seeing with my own eyes the facts on the ground and feeling in my own gut a little of what life is like under occupation, I got VERY PISSED OFF and had to DO SOMETHING!

My government and mainstream media do NOT tell the truth and the spin they spin makes me want to puke. Not all members of the internationally recognized transparent democratically elected members of Hamas are terrorists and democracy cannot be spread through the barrel of a gun.

Criticizing the Israeli government is not anti-Semitic, just as dissenting from the neo-con ideology is not unpatriotic; in fact it is much more in line with our founding fathers;

"Soon after I had published the pamphlet "Common Sense" [on Feb. 14, 1776] in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion. The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine

But what really gets my Irish up, is that so many American Christians have no clue about the Christian Exodus from the Holy Land which began in 1948 when innocent people were forced to flee from their homes for fear of their life after they learned of the barbaric terrorism perpetuated by Zionist imperialist in the massacre at Deir Yassin.

"Early in the morning of Friday, April 9, 1948, commandos of the Irgun, headed by Menachem Begin, and the Stern Gang attacked Deir Yassin, a village with about 750 Palestinian residents. It was several weeks before the end of the British Mandate. The village lay outside of the area that the United Nations recommended be included in a future Jewish State. Deir Yassin had a peaceful reputation and was even said by a Jewish newspaper to have driven out some Arab militants. But it was located on high ground in the corridor between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem and one plan, kept secret until years afterwards, called for it to be destroyed and the residents evacuated to make way for a small airfield that would supply the beleaguered Jewish residents of Jerusalem.

By noon over 100 people, half of them women and children, had been systematically murdered. Four commandos died at the hands of resisting Palestinians using old Mausers and muskets. Twenty-five male villagers were loaded into trucks, paraded through the Zakhron Yosef quarter in Jerusalem, and then taken to a stone quarry along the road between Givat Shaul and Deir Yassin and shot to death. The remaining residents were driven to Arab East Jerusalem.

"That evening the Irgunists and the Sternists escorted a party of foreign correspondents to a house at Givat Shaul, a nearby Jewish settlement founded in 1906. Over tea and cookies they amplified the details of the operation and justified it, saying Deir Yassin had become a concentration point for Arabs, including Syrians and Iraqis, planning to attack the western suburbs of Jerusalem. They said that 25 members of the Haganah militia had reinforced the attack and claimed that an Arabic-speaking Jew had warned the villagers over a loudspeaker from an armored car. This was duly reported in The New York Times on April 10.

"A final body count of 254 was reported by The New York Times on April 13, a day after they were finally buried. By then the leaders of the Haganah had distanced themselves from having participated in the attack and issued a statement denouncing the dissidents of Irgun and the Stern Gang, just as they had after the attack on the King David Hotel in July 1946. A 1987 study undertaken by Birzeit University's Center for Research and Documentation of Palestinian Society found "the numbers of those killed does not exceed 120".

"The Haganah leaders admitted that the massacre "disgraced the cause of Jewish fighters and dishonored Jewish arms and the Jewish flag." They played down the fact that their militia had reinforced the terrorists' attack, even though they did not participate in the barbarism and looting during the subsequent "mopping up" operations.

"They also played down the fact that, in Begin's words, "Deir Yassin was captured with the knowledge of the Haganah and with the approval of its commander" as a part of its "plan for establishing an airfield."

"Ben Gurion even sent an apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But this horrific act served the future State of Israel well. According to Begin:

"Arabs throughout the country, induced to believe wild tales of "Irgun butchery," were seized with limitless panic and started to flee for their lives. This mass flight soon developed into a maddened, uncontrollable stampede. The political and economic significance of this development can hardly be overestimated." [1]

The Christian Exodus from the Holy Land has escalated in recent years to reduce their numbers from 20% of the total population of the Holy Land, to less than 1.3% since 1948. The reasons for the exodus of the most well educated and consistently nonviolent members of society are the now 40 years of occupation and oppression that has resulted in lack of economic opportunities, The Wall which divides them from their land, resources, families and holy sites and the increasing sense of hopelessness that fuels militancy and the growth of fundamentalism within all three branches of Father Abraham's offspring's.

Palestinians are inherently peaceful people who have been made to pay for the sins of The Third Reich and it is way past time for the world to WAKE UP from the holocaust hangover that has allowed America's best friend in the world to become the biggest bully on the planet.

International Law demands that occupation is to be temporary, maintain the status quo, not pilfer the resources of the occupied, nor transfer the occupier's population into occupied territory. But Israel does not adhere to international law; they follow the law of the jungle.

American media reports much about Islamic fundamentalism, but not on the inherently anti-Semitic cultish and escapist theology of Christian Zionism or the ultra-Orthodox Jews of the Holy Land. On July 19, 2007, Haaretz reported "The end of Zionism" regarding the increasing numbers of youth who refuse to serve.

"Some young people explain their evasion of service by their loss of confidence in the leadership, the cases of corruption and the state's abandonment of its soldiers. But there is also an accumulated weariness with the state of war, which has already lasted 60 years, and many young people, along with their parents, are no longer willing to sacrifice their lives on the altar of the settlers' expansionist dreams.

"After all, 25 percent of those eligible for the draft never serve at all (11 percent receive exemptions for yeshiva studies, 7 percent for health reasons, 4 percent reside abroad and 3 percent have a criminal record). Of those drafted, 17.5 percent do not complete a full three years of service. The sharpest rise in the number of draft-dodgers is among the ultra-Orthodox. In 1974, they comprised only 2.4 percent of those eligible for the draft. Today, the figure is 11 percent.

"Against this background, it is shocking to learn that yesterday the Knesset decided to extend the so-called Tal Law…a cynical, immoral law that absolves a significant portion of Jewish Israelis from the need to either do army service or work for a living. The fact is that 80 percent of ultra-Orthodox men do not work; instead, they live on government grants and stipends and the earnings of their wives.

"The secular donkey does not merely bear the military and economic burden; it also continues to expand the scope of government support for ultra-Orthodox education, including even the most extremist strains. About two months ago, the Knesset, by a large majority, approved the so-called Nahari Law, which compels the municipalities to grant equal funding to ultra-Orthodox schools that are not part of the official education system. These are extremist institutions…they do not teach mathematics, English, nature, science, civics, geography or history. In other words, they deliberately fail to train their graduates for a life of work and productivity. So these graduates have no choice but to cling to the coattails of ultra-Orthodox activists. And where will the new funding for these extremist schools come from? [2]

Every day the U.S.A. provides over $7,023,288.00 to the Israeli government and military and over $108 Billion since 1948. "Generous as it is, what Israel actually got in U.S. aid is considerably less than what it has cost U.S. taxpayers to provide it. The principal difference is that so long as the U.S. runs an annual budget deficit, every dollar of aid the U.S. gives Israel has to be raised through U.S. government borrowing."- Richard Curtiss [3]

On July 19, 2007, in the Old City of Jerusalem, Professor Albert Aghazarian, addressed nearly three dozen international and Palestinian youth and this reporter who had gathered for Sabeel's 2nd International young Adult Conference: 40 Years in the Wilderness…40 Years of Occupation...

He said two things that have not left my conscience since: "In a nutshell, there is a deep schizophrenia in the Holy Land; what we see, hear and talk. Zionism is the original sin; Zionism is an untouchable icon. You can curse Mohammad, you can curse Mary, but not Zionism…Do your best, and as long as you give it your best shot, don't worry about the rest."

But injustice is unsustainable and all things must pass...

"There is a time for everything; a time to tear and a time to mend, a time to be silent and a time to speak, a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace." –Ecclesiastes 3: 1, 7, 8

1. http://www.deiryassin.org/mas.html

2. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/883868.html

3. http://ifamericansknew.org/stats/usaid.html#source

Eileen Fleming, Founder WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Author "Keep Hope Alive"
"Memoirs of a Nice Irish American 'Girl's' Life in Occupied Territory"
Producer "30 Minutes With Vanunu" and "13 Minutes with Vanunu"

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Comments

Rich/Eileen - in partial agreement and disagreement

wpeltz's picture

Rich - I agree with you (and Angelo) that Eileen's postings are usually too long and often repeat passages that's she's posted before. Tighter self-editing would be helpful for readers and for the message.

However, I disagree about even-handedness and credibility.

Considering how one-sided most of the major media outlets are, Eileen is "balancing the media voice" on Israel/Palestine. It's rather like CrossLeft's mission of "balancing the Christian voice". How much pro-religious right or pro-political right information and arguments do we regulars try to present here?

While making the proper acknowledgments that there have been crimes on both sides, I think there's a strong case that the fundamental problem stems from the fundamentalist elements of Zionism and the consequent expansion, recognized widely as being a breach of what passes for international law, of Israeli settlements in Palestinian territory -- plus the consequent practice of collective punishment, also established as illegal. Given the asymmetries of military and economic power, I think it's appropriate to focus on Israel as presenting the major, though not the sole, obstacle to peace now.

US aid and general carte blanche to Israel is also a problem. President Obama's backing away from his earlier expressions of sympathy with Palestinians' suffering shows just how big our political problem is. And although it's a little encouraging that Sec. of State Clinton brought up house demolitions, her language was very measured and restrained.

There's a lot of history to discuss and sort out and argue about, to be sure. And it would be good to do that with a spirit of open-minded listening to all sides, trying to determine truths rather than scoring debating points or ranting.

But when it comes to actual truths, although Eileen shows only one side, that doesn't mean she's inaccurate. While I haven't fact-checked everything she's written here, what I have looked into -- or previously known from other reading -- is accurate. Her information is credible. Sometimes facts are 'incredibly' one-sided. (I think of Frank's series on the Catholic Right as an example.)

Re: anti-semitism -- your sentence with "write you off as a far left radical" could be taken as equating radical leftism with anti-semitism. As a relatively far left radical, I hope you don't mean that. We have to work against the perception, mentioned by Eileen, that criticizing Israel is anti-Jewish. (And that's another reason for Eileen to write in a less overwhelming style.)

In practice, "anti-Semitic" is a euphemism for "anti-Jew". There's not much in the way of irony there, since few people pay attention to the linguistic classification of Arabic as a Semitic language.

Shalom,
Bill

Anti-Semitic

Well Bill, then Eileen is correct that our press reflects the one sidedness of the mid-east situation. She would do the world a favor by pointing out that the phrase, while not generally consider anti-Arabic, applies to both Jew and Arab. This general loss of meaning quite pointedly illustrates the extreme difficulties the world faces in resolving the seemingly intractible issues in the mid-east. If can't even use terms such as this one accurately, then how in the earth can we even have meaningful, useful dialogue?

While I agree that she should be free to express her ideas, more balance and conciseness would add much greater power to her arguments. I'm not asking her to tone it down, to lose her passion, just to be more open to counter arguments, to reflect that "while the Palestinians think this, the Isreali's think that". I educates the reader, draws them into a deeper understanding.

As for writing her off as a far left radical, this apparently has been done. Frank has pointed she has been banned from other discussion groups. Ours may be the only one left that tolerates her tirades, and that is how I read them, tirades. Whatever good information she presents gets lost in the highly emotional one sideness of her arguments.

Her positions test the level of tolerance this community has for strongly dissenting opinions. I believe we have room here for her thoughts.

Etymology vs. Usage

wpeltz's picture

Rich, when you complain about not being able to use "anti-semitic" accurately, you've wrongly assumed that the etymology determines the definition. "Anti-semitic" has always meant "anti-Jewish", not anti-speakers-of-Semitic-languages. Every dictionary or thesaurus I've looked at is in agreement on this.

So there's not been a loss of meaning here. For anti-Arabic, there's "anti-Arabic", not "anti-Semitic". And then there's "anti-Muslim" or other variations on the anti-Islamic theme. Any difficulty in "meaningful, useful dialogue" stemming from differences in usage of this word is an artifact of an ahistorical etymological inference that's rather common among the well-educated.

There's a short account in Wiktionary of the invention of "antisemitic" in 1860 by an Austrian Jewish scholar and then the coinage by a German journalist and pamphleteer in 1880 of "antisemitism" as a higher-class replacement for the brutally direct word "Judenhass" - "Jew-hatred". (The entry, at en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anti-semitism, has a link to a long and helpful piece in Wikipedia.)

The journalist, Wilhelm Marr, immediately started the "League of Antisemites" in 1880. This "Antisemiten Liga" was the very first organization in Germany specifically to target Jews and Jewish "influences", and to advocate the forced removal of all Jews from Germany. So the history of the word is short but uniformly nasty and specific.

As for Eileen's manner of presentation, I agree that more light and less heat (and a more liberal use of the "delete" key), would help spread her message more effectively. But again, I take issue with her having been written off "as a far left radical", as if "far left" and "tirades" go together seamlessly. I would hope that the bannings from other sides were for "ranting" rather than for having "strongly dissenting opinions", and also that on this site it's not her views that go beyond anyone's level of tolerance for disagreements but just her style -- including the reposting of some of the same long, long messages from time to time.

The problem as I see it is that there's nothing of the dialogic about Eileen's writing. Otherwise, offhand, I can't think of any time I've dissented from her opinions in any major way. If her style were different, I'd probably have been motivated to reply positively to many of her posts.

Bill

Semitic

Bill,
In common usage I agree.

By employing use of the term in a broader sense, I was inviting us to focus more upon what binds, and not divides, the human family. If we see that the mid-eastern people speak languages that have a common source (Afro-Asiatic), and have a common ancestor in Abraham, we broaden the perspective on the mid-east conflict, and and offer a broader, more solid foundation upon which long term peace can be built.

Jesus spoke Aramaic, Hebraic and most likely Latin. If we are to spread the good news then we need to focus on his teachings and not as embellished by the writers of the gospel who never met, nor heard him speak first hand. As you know I prefer to use a version of the Bible which translates Aramaic directly into English, thus "correcting" and further avoiding the mis-translations from the Greek an Latin. His message is as important today as it has ever been.

Eileen provides much needed information on the Palestinians people. That said, what I'd like to hear more of is not just how the Palestinians have suffered, and continue. So have, and do, the Jews. Enough of the suffering already! Tell us what binds the two people. Compare and contrast the two, see where they compliment, how their common experience binds them, and not so much divides them. Be a peace broker.

If you read the human family DNA you'll see that we came from east Africa. Is it any wonder then these people share common DNA, language and spritual ancestry? If this "Christain" nation acted more like what we claim, then we'd be the honest broker the mid-east sorely needs. Jesus was a peacemaker. Let us embody his teachings.

Rich

Good Points, Bill and Rich, about Eileen's Posts

Angelo Lopez's picture

Good points Bill and Rich. When I first read Eileen's posts about a year ago, I initially assumed she was anti-Israel based on the provacative titles of her posts. When I took the time to read her posts, though, and to follow the links, I found quotes sympathetic to Israel, as well as Israeli and Jewish groups sympathetic to the plight of Palestinians in refugee camps. It's just that she crams so much information in her posts, this information gets lost.

Rev. Canon Naim Ateek, founder of the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center in Jerusalem was quoted by Eileen as saying, "The Palestinians need to become really conscious of and sensitive to the horror of the Holocaust. ...We must understand the importance and significance of the Holocaust to the Jews, while insisting that the Jews understand the tragedy of Palestine for the Palestinians."

Eileen also quoted Abuna Elias Chacur, the Melkite priest and 3 time Nobel Peace Prize nominee. He said, "I am a Palestinian Israeli who lives for peace and reconciliation. The problem here is not about the land. There is a blockage between Arabs and Jews. It must end. We need to explore a third way to rise above the conflict. There are three million Palestinians living in refugee camps! This injustice must come to an end. Once, we Jews and Arabs were partners and friends. The only way out of this conflict is to rise above it."

In other posts Eileen talked about the Israeli Peace bloc Gush Shalom http://www.gush-shalom.org, who have bought and deliver water filters for Gaza. Eileen has also mentioned groups in Israel including Coalition of Women for Peace, Combatants for Peace, Committee Against House Demolitions, New Profile, Hadash, Balad, Adalah, Tarabut /Hitahbrut, Alternative Information Center, Bat Shalom, Anarchists Against the Wall, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, Follow-Up Committee of the Arab Population in Israel and Psychoactive.

Hopefully Eileen will have a chance to explain things. When I read her posts and just general information about the two groups, it seems like the Israelis and Palestinians are caught in a vicious circle. Groups of Palestinians lash out against the Israelis because of the severe restrictions placed on their lives. The Israelis feel threatened and place even more severe restrictions upon Palestinians. It feeds upon itself. I think that Bill is right in that Eileen is so close to the situation, it's hard for her not to be adament in trying to get her message out.

Angelo

Learn a lot from Eileen's Posts, but they are a bit long

Angelo Lopez's picture

I've learned a lot from Eileen's posts about the efforts of nonviolent Palestinian Christian groups like Sabeel and from people like Archbishop Elias Chacour, Vananu, and others. But Rich is right that they are a bit long. Like Rich, I have to wade through Eileen's posts. But if one is patient, there is a lot of good information in them. I agree with Rich that if they were more concise, it would be easier to get the central message of the posts.

I also agree with Rich's constructive criticism about including Israeli or Jewish people who are also against Israel's policy of expanding settlements in the West Bank. In the above article, there is mention of Rabbi Kobi Bornstein, a former resident of Neveh Dekalim and leader of the anti-disengagement struggle. So it looks like Eileen tries to do that. But there is so much information, it gets lost. I don't always agree with Eileen's points, but Eileen is passionate about the plight of Palestinians and should have a chance to argue it out. But if her posts are more concise, I think it would be easier to understand some of her points.

Angelo

Eileen - please

Eileen,
While you provide good information, I find it very hard to read thru your long postings. It feels more like wading. Please do try to be more concise. Being of the long winded stripe I can relate to this, thus I plead guilty to the same malady.

Additionally, your presentation would have much more impact, more credibilty with me if you strove to be more even handed. A casual reader would, on first hand review, think you are anti-semitic, and write you off as a far left radical, unworthy of a further read.

That's ironic, the term Semite includes both Jews and Arabs, the latter includes, of course, the people of Palestine you support.

I must admit I do not read thru all of your posts, it simply takes too long, and based on past history I question your objectivity.

Please more conciseness and balance. Your considerable contributions then might have more of the impact you seek.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
register